A WARNING FOR MR. TRUMP'S SECURITY TEAM
By Mexican Anonymous
Stuxnet on a plane? "Severe turbulence" suspicious
Severe turbulence stories for TWO, not just one, Airbus airliner are too similar and too close together to avoid suspicion, most likely someone is playing around
Scenario 1: On Wednesday May 4, 2016 an Airbus A320, flight EY474 from Abu Dhabi to Jakarta encountered severe and unexpected clear weather turbulence about 45 minutes before its arrival at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport. Several people were severely injured and hospitalized.
Scenario 2: On Thursday, May 5, 2016 an Airbus A319, Allegiant Airlines flight 7001 from Punto Cana to Pittsburgh encountered severe and unexpected clear weather turbulence and was forced to land in Florida. Several people were seriously injured and hospitalized.
Two nearly identical "turbulence" scenarios that resulted in serious injuries in completely different parts of the world with two very similar aircraft from the same manufacturer happened a day apart. YEAH RIGHT. SOMEONE IS PLAYING AROUND WITH A NEW CYBER TERROR TOY or using an old terror toy to prime the public conscience for an upcoming huge event.
Pilots have to fly planes responsibly. Any aircraft, (except for those that have computers to prevent it, like Airbus aircraft have) can be flown to it's destruction by the pilot. Airbus has a computer controlled limit at 3 G's of force, and Boeing, which has no limit can be pushed to 7+ G's (where presumably the wings will snap off). That is irrelevant however in this case. What is relevant is the fact that ANY plane can be instructed to fly in a destructive way. And if someone now has a hack on Airbus, they can take over the planes via remote, and give the pilots and passengers one hell of a "turbulence" ride.
No pilot or passenger is going to know the difference between the plane being instructed to rapidly bob up and down, or if real wind turbulence did it. Any of the passenger aircraft flying nowadays can hit positive and negative G forces that will totally mess up the passengers if the pilots, (or hackers) choose to cause it. And that is what I am suspecting in these two cases, they happened too close together in time (a day apart), they were both clear weather incidents, and they happened with aircraft that were too similar and from the same manufacturer.
It looks very suspicious, and is definitely possible. And guess what? As bad as these stories sound, both of these airbus never hit more than +-1.5 g's of force. If you are not belted in that is all it will take to make everyone fly out of their seats.
Trump has a Boeing, which can hit the full 7 g's. What is going to happen if that gets hacked, and told to bob around with let's say +- 3-5 g's of force for a minute or two while the pilots are buckled in? Trump and everyone else except the pilots would be hamburger. Trump would be dead and the pilots would still land the plane in one piece, so people could not say "conspiracy plane crash" AND THESE "TURBULENCE" STORIES MIGHT BE THE PRECEDENT FOR DOING EXACTLY THAT.
PEOPLE NEED TO TELL TRUMP TO WATCH HIS BUTT WHILE FLYING, AND TO BUCKLE IN.
By Mexican Anonymous
Stuxnet on a plane? "Severe turbulence" suspicious
Severe turbulence stories for TWO, not just one, Airbus airliner are too similar and too close together to avoid suspicion, most likely someone is playing around
Scenario 1: On Wednesday May 4, 2016 an Airbus A320, flight EY474 from Abu Dhabi to Jakarta encountered severe and unexpected clear weather turbulence about 45 minutes before its arrival at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport. Several people were severely injured and hospitalized.
Scenario 2: On Thursday, May 5, 2016 an Airbus A319, Allegiant Airlines flight 7001 from Punto Cana to Pittsburgh encountered severe and unexpected clear weather turbulence and was forced to land in Florida. Several people were seriously injured and hospitalized.
Two nearly identical "turbulence" scenarios that resulted in serious injuries in completely different parts of the world with two very similar aircraft from the same manufacturer happened a day apart. YEAH RIGHT. SOMEONE IS PLAYING AROUND WITH A NEW CYBER TERROR TOY or using an old terror toy to prime the public conscience for an upcoming huge event.
Pilots have to fly planes responsibly. Any aircraft, (except for those that have computers to prevent it, like Airbus aircraft have) can be flown to it's destruction by the pilot. Airbus has a computer controlled limit at 3 G's of force, and Boeing, which has no limit can be pushed to 7+ G's (where presumably the wings will snap off). That is irrelevant however in this case. What is relevant is the fact that ANY plane can be instructed to fly in a destructive way. And if someone now has a hack on Airbus, they can take over the planes via remote, and give the pilots and passengers one hell of a "turbulence" ride.
No pilot or passenger is going to know the difference between the plane being instructed to rapidly bob up and down, or if real wind turbulence did it. Any of the passenger aircraft flying nowadays can hit positive and negative G forces that will totally mess up the passengers if the pilots, (or hackers) choose to cause it. And that is what I am suspecting in these two cases, they happened too close together in time (a day apart), they were both clear weather incidents, and they happened with aircraft that were too similar and from the same manufacturer.
It looks very suspicious, and is definitely possible. And guess what? As bad as these stories sound, both of these airbus never hit more than +-1.5 g's of force. If you are not belted in that is all it will take to make everyone fly out of their seats.
Trump has a Boeing, which can hit the full 7 g's. What is going to happen if that gets hacked, and told to bob around with let's say +- 3-5 g's of force for a minute or two while the pilots are buckled in? Trump and everyone else except the pilots would be hamburger. Trump would be dead and the pilots would still land the plane in one piece, so people could not say "conspiracy plane crash" AND THESE "TURBULENCE" STORIES MIGHT BE THE PRECEDENT FOR DOING EXACTLY THAT.
PEOPLE NEED TO TELL TRUMP TO WATCH HIS BUTT WHILE FLYING, AND TO BUCKLE IN.