*Goldman Sachs does not normally loan to people for a political run, it does not fit their loan parameters or protocol.
*Therefore, this loan to Ted & Heidi was NOT a normal loan and highly suspicious as it does not fit Goldman Sachs lending practices or protocol http://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/investing-and-lending/banking/index.html within the normal business functions of an investment bank when 90% of their business is with corporations except a very few, very elite investors who are considered “very high net worth individuals” (in 1985 that category was over 10-20 million, much higher by now, yet Ted and Heidi were not in that category when the loan was given and only had a $1 mil net worth. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/us/politics/ted-cruz-wall-street-loan-senate-bid-2012.html?_r=0
*http://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/investment-management/private-wealth-management/) Ted and Heidi were no where near achieving the required “high net-worth status, and an investment bank could not make this kind of loan without significant income, collateral, and reasons, making it clear there are some very strong strings attached to this loan, typically an under-the-radar loan to a government. or politician would be made w the understanding that as long as that politician performed in a way that was beneficial to the bank the loan may never need to be repaid, after all how was Ted going to pay back $1million loan on $140k/yr salary?
WHERE WAS THE INCOME TO PAY IT BACK? THE COLLATERAL? THE PURPOSE OF THE LOAN? UNTHINKABLE? NOT STANDARD BANKING PROTOCOL? There must have been some very strong strings attached to this loan, to a govn. or politician wld be made w the understanding that as long as that politician performed in a way that was beneficial to the bank the loan may never need to be repaid, after all how was Ted going to pay back $1million loan on $140k/yr salary?
Therefore the GOLDMAN SACHS LOAN was likely to have been in the category of a political favor loan that is AN ONCALL LOAN THAT REQUIRES THE POLITICIAN TO PERFORM FOR GOLDMAN SACHS IN ORDER TO KEEP THE LOAN FROM BEING CALLED DUE!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU1... start at 4:27 and listen there.
* Ted Cruz voted for cloture on TPA, (trans pacific partnership agreement)
fast track trade authority, removing the hurdle of concern for further amendment, and clearing the way for passage!
It didn't have to be recorded, so nobody knew this.
He voted NOT to require approval of congress before other countries could join, including China.
* Cruz has openly stated that he will NOT use a deportation force, and will continue to use the failed ICE system, where an illegal has to commit a crime first, then be caught.
* Cruz belongs to the radical Christian sect of 7 Mountains Dominionism. Heidi, also was arrested in Austin, TX, she was wondering around on a busy main Hwy. in the middle of the night. Police took her to jail and then to a psychiatric hospital stating she was a danger to others and herself.
He has always been establishment, he is bought and paid by the banks.
He did not vote to audit the Federal Reserve, he most certainly is establishment!!
BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY GOLDMAN SACHS AND THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT AGENDA!!
*Therefore, this loan to Ted & Heidi was NOT a normal loan and highly suspicious as it does not fit Goldman Sachs lending practices or protocol http://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/investing-and-lending/banking/index.html within the normal business functions of an investment bank when 90% of their business is with corporations except a very few, very elite investors who are considered “very high net worth individuals” (in 1985 that category was over 10-20 million, much higher by now, yet Ted and Heidi were not in that category when the loan was given and only had a $1 mil net worth. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/us/politics/ted-cruz-wall-street-loan-senate-bid-2012.html?_r=0
*http://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/investment-management/private-wealth-management/) Ted and Heidi were no where near achieving the required “high net-worth status, and an investment bank could not make this kind of loan without significant income, collateral, and reasons, making it clear there are some very strong strings attached to this loan, typically an under-the-radar loan to a government. or politician would be made w the understanding that as long as that politician performed in a way that was beneficial to the bank the loan may never need to be repaid, after all how was Ted going to pay back $1million loan on $140k/yr salary?
WHERE WAS THE INCOME TO PAY IT BACK? THE COLLATERAL? THE PURPOSE OF THE LOAN? UNTHINKABLE? NOT STANDARD BANKING PROTOCOL? There must have been some very strong strings attached to this loan, to a govn. or politician wld be made w the understanding that as long as that politician performed in a way that was beneficial to the bank the loan may never need to be repaid, after all how was Ted going to pay back $1million loan on $140k/yr salary?
Therefore the GOLDMAN SACHS LOAN was likely to have been in the category of a political favor loan that is AN ONCALL LOAN THAT REQUIRES THE POLITICIAN TO PERFORM FOR GOLDMAN SACHS IN ORDER TO KEEP THE LOAN FROM BEING CALLED DUE!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU1... start at 4:27 and listen there.
* Ted Cruz voted for cloture on TPA, (trans pacific partnership agreement)
fast track trade authority, removing the hurdle of concern for further amendment, and clearing the way for passage!
It didn't have to be recorded, so nobody knew this.
He voted NOT to require approval of congress before other countries could join, including China.
* Cruz has openly stated that he will NOT use a deportation force, and will continue to use the failed ICE system, where an illegal has to commit a crime first, then be caught.
* Cruz belongs to the radical Christian sect of 7 Mountains Dominionism. Heidi, also was arrested in Austin, TX, she was wondering around on a busy main Hwy. in the middle of the night. Police took her to jail and then to a psychiatric hospital stating she was a danger to others and herself.
He has always been establishment, he is bought and paid by the banks.
He did not vote to audit the Federal Reserve, he most certainly is establishment!!
BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY GOLDMAN SACHS AND THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT AGENDA!!