ISIS Might Have Their Own Passport Printer
http://abcnews.go.com/International/us-intel-isis-passport-printing-machine-blank-passports/story?id=35700681
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/10/us/san-bernardino-shooting/
RUSH: "San Bernardino: Farook Tied to Jihadist Recruiter." This is CNN story by Evan Perez and Pamela Brown. "The San Bernardino mass shooting caught authorities by surprise. Neither of the two shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, were on law enforcement's radar. One week later, the investigation has turned up that while the possibility remains that the couple were self-radicalized, their terror plot did not happen in a vacuum." Here we are with this "radicalized" term again. You know, I mentioned yesterday that I had a little bit of problem with this 'cause I think the term...
The way it's being used by people like this, it's almost to make these people victims. "Ah, I mean, they were a normal, happily married couple, seeking the American dream, working at the development center for whatever. They had a baby, going out there and buying cars. And then somebody radicalized 'em! Oh, no! How sad! Somebody radicalized them. They were perfectly fine, normal people; then some SOB got hold of 'em and made 'em mean!" Folks, can I give you a Undeniable Truth of Life here? Every one of these people has been "radicalized."
I don't know anybody comes out of the womb asking for a bomb to be strapped to them so they can go blow up a bus. Do you? Every damned one of them has been radicalized. That, of course, is the whole point. But yet we're using it to explain one-offs. We're using it to explain what we really don't want to admit. And by "we," I mean, Obama and the Democrats and the establishment and you name it. You and I are perfectly willing to admit what we face and want to do something about it.
So now we have "San Bernardino: Farook Tied to Jihadist Recruiter." So now they're find, "Well, this guy, he might have known somebody in jihad that recruited him." Well, they all do. Nobody's born this way. Every one of these people has to meet somebody that radicalizes 'em. It could start with their mother. It could start with their father. It could start with an uncle. It could start with the imam in the mosque. Every one of them does!
"ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine, Blank Passports." ABC News' Brian Ross, out looking for Tea Party connections to the San Bernardino massacre, instead found that: "With the US and other countries on high alert for ISIS attacks, American authorities are warning the terror group's followers may have infiltrated American borders with authentic-looking passports ISIS has printed itself with its own machines, according to an intelligence report obtained by ABC News." Brian Ross is looking for a Tea Party connection, no doubt, and stumbled upon the fact that ISIS has a passport-printing machine.
Yeah, somewhere in the ISIS compound there's a passport printer. You go pick one up yourself. What'd they do, order it from Amazon? This headline... "ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine, Blank Passports." This headline is classic. It is a textbook example of how the State-Controlled Media do not report things in order to help the Regime. Now, in this case, our media had basically ignored the fact that ISIS has been making fake Syrian passports for 17 months, for crying out loud. This is not news.
The idea, the concept of fake Syrian passports has been reported and discussed here for a year and a half, folks. And the reason they don't want anything to undercut Obama's plan to import thousands of supposed Syrian refugees -- 70% of whom are gonna be future Democrat voters -- to the United States. But in reality, the British press has been reporting on this fake passport production line that ISIS has for a long time. British press reporters have even bought them. But you notice how even the headline to this story pretends that still might not be true.
"ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine..." Is this is...? I'm telling you, it's classic. This is how the media refuses to report things that are already out there in other places in order to protect Obama. From the Washington Times: "Fiance Visa Program Will Continue as Feds Review its Weaknesses." Now, bear in mind... See, people don't know this. Do you know in 2009, Obama streamlined the the fiance visa program? Do you know how he streamlined it in 2009? Starting in 2009, because of an Obama proclamation, foreigners can obtain a fiance visa entirely online.
They do not even have to show up for an interview. Since 2009, the last six years, folks, there is not one interview required for a fiance visa. And you will not find that fact on this story from the Washington Times. No media is reporting that. "The White House said Thursday that it won't seek an immediate suspension of the 'fiancee' visa program, under which the female terrorist in the massacre of 14 people in California last week entered the US. 'This is something that is under careful review' by the administration, said White House press secretary Josh Earnest.
"He added that if the review by the State Department and Department of Homeland Security recommends changes to the K-1 visa program, President Obama 'won't hesitate to order those reforms.' But he said there are no plans to halt the program during the review." Why not? No, the better question is, "Of course they're not gonna change the program." Here you have a number of potential Muslim terrorists able to get into the country on it, why would we change it? Because we're back to this again.
Apparently anybody who wants to come to this country should be automatically allowed in, and what the American people think about it is of no consequence whatsoever. Immigration is a subject about which the desires, preferences, political preferences of the American people are what should be dominant. But they aren't.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/us-intel-isis-passport-printing-machine-blank-passports/story?id=35700681
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/10/us/san-bernardino-shooting/
RUSH: "San Bernardino: Farook Tied to Jihadist Recruiter." This is CNN story by Evan Perez and Pamela Brown. "The San Bernardino mass shooting caught authorities by surprise. Neither of the two shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, were on law enforcement's radar. One week later, the investigation has turned up that while the possibility remains that the couple were self-radicalized, their terror plot did not happen in a vacuum." Here we are with this "radicalized" term again. You know, I mentioned yesterday that I had a little bit of problem with this 'cause I think the term...
The way it's being used by people like this, it's almost to make these people victims. "Ah, I mean, they were a normal, happily married couple, seeking the American dream, working at the development center for whatever. They had a baby, going out there and buying cars. And then somebody radicalized 'em! Oh, no! How sad! Somebody radicalized them. They were perfectly fine, normal people; then some SOB got hold of 'em and made 'em mean!" Folks, can I give you a Undeniable Truth of Life here? Every one of these people has been "radicalized."
I don't know anybody comes out of the womb asking for a bomb to be strapped to them so they can go blow up a bus. Do you? Every damned one of them has been radicalized. That, of course, is the whole point. But yet we're using it to explain one-offs. We're using it to explain what we really don't want to admit. And by "we," I mean, Obama and the Democrats and the establishment and you name it. You and I are perfectly willing to admit what we face and want to do something about it.
So now we have "San Bernardino: Farook Tied to Jihadist Recruiter." So now they're find, "Well, this guy, he might have known somebody in jihad that recruited him." Well, they all do. Nobody's born this way. Every one of these people has to meet somebody that radicalizes 'em. It could start with their mother. It could start with their father. It could start with an uncle. It could start with the imam in the mosque. Every one of them does!
"ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine, Blank Passports." ABC News' Brian Ross, out looking for Tea Party connections to the San Bernardino massacre, instead found that: "With the US and other countries on high alert for ISIS attacks, American authorities are warning the terror group's followers may have infiltrated American borders with authentic-looking passports ISIS has printed itself with its own machines, according to an intelligence report obtained by ABC News." Brian Ross is looking for a Tea Party connection, no doubt, and stumbled upon the fact that ISIS has a passport-printing machine.
Yeah, somewhere in the ISIS compound there's a passport printer. You go pick one up yourself. What'd they do, order it from Amazon? This headline... "ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine, Blank Passports." This headline is classic. It is a textbook example of how the State-Controlled Media do not report things in order to help the Regime. Now, in this case, our media had basically ignored the fact that ISIS has been making fake Syrian passports for 17 months, for crying out loud. This is not news.
The idea, the concept of fake Syrian passports has been reported and discussed here for a year and a half, folks. And the reason they don't want anything to undercut Obama's plan to import thousands of supposed Syrian refugees -- 70% of whom are gonna be future Democrat voters -- to the United States. But in reality, the British press has been reporting on this fake passport production line that ISIS has for a long time. British press reporters have even bought them. But you notice how even the headline to this story pretends that still might not be true.
"ISIS May Have Passport-Printing Machine..." Is this is...? I'm telling you, it's classic. This is how the media refuses to report things that are already out there in other places in order to protect Obama. From the Washington Times: "Fiance Visa Program Will Continue as Feds Review its Weaknesses." Now, bear in mind... See, people don't know this. Do you know in 2009, Obama streamlined the the fiance visa program? Do you know how he streamlined it in 2009? Starting in 2009, because of an Obama proclamation, foreigners can obtain a fiance visa entirely online.
They do not even have to show up for an interview. Since 2009, the last six years, folks, there is not one interview required for a fiance visa. And you will not find that fact on this story from the Washington Times. No media is reporting that. "The White House said Thursday that it won't seek an immediate suspension of the 'fiancee' visa program, under which the female terrorist in the massacre of 14 people in California last week entered the US. 'This is something that is under careful review' by the administration, said White House press secretary Josh Earnest.
"He added that if the review by the State Department and Department of Homeland Security recommends changes to the K-1 visa program, President Obama 'won't hesitate to order those reforms.' But he said there are no plans to halt the program during the review." Why not? No, the better question is, "Of course they're not gonna change the program." Here you have a number of potential Muslim terrorists able to get into the country on it, why would we change it? Because we're back to this again.
Apparently anybody who wants to come to this country should be automatically allowed in, and what the American people think about it is of no consequence whatsoever. Immigration is a subject about which the desires, preferences, political preferences of the American people are what should be dominant. But they aren't.