Just some thoughts on the filibuster & the nuclear option. Both parties when out of office jumped all over the opposing parties to create the so called "NUCLEAR OPTION" only this time the GOP would be on the receiving end. Of course the question is, is this a good idea regardless who would be on the loosing end so to speak. Well the definition of a "filibuster" is "an action such as a prolonged speech that obstructs in a legislative assembly" so i ask you could we do with one less obstruction in our legislative process. One last thing no one party should be able to shut down the government at a cost of $24 Billion thats rite with a "B" one party control that is something you would expect from China & Russia, really, well under all Presidents there have been 168 filibusters, against Obama 82 filibusters, almost half against one President, why well we would have to ask the "DICTATORSHIP" of the GOP