Michael Hastings death had many many anomalies, which led many people to conclude many things and sparked a lot of fights. I basically settled for low speed crash and someone torched the car where it sat and that it might not have even been Hasting's car. I never thought a bomb expelled the engine, and instead figured it was dropped as a prop where it was, and after dredging the videos deeply even found one where I'd bet $50 it was Hastings in the crowd watching the car burn.

In the story of Hastings, there is one COLD HARD FACT: We have all been lied to so much that you can be 100 percent proof positive that did not happen the way we were told it did, so in sorting out the lies people will come to different conclusions. There was not as good of an evidence path with Hastings as there was with the San Bernardino shooting, which was easy to sew up in a body bag because obvious definite provable mistakes were made in abundance. There is very little disagreement with San Bernardino simply because they botched it so bad and there was a lot of footage. Hastings will never be agreed on unanimously because there just is not enough definite proof of anything, other than that it is obvious a huge lie was told, wherever the facts may actually fall.
-- MEXICAN ANONYMOUS