TECHNOLOGY FAIL?
SPACEX EXPLOSION & HILLARY'S EMAIL HACKS
Media quiet after FBI release
It seems like all they have to say is people are picking on Bill, and Russia is influencing America's elections. Most of it is also quiet about the obvious strike on a spaceX rocket. I guess those who did the attack on the rocket were not expecting a camera to be filming it that had a frame exposure speed of at least 2,000 - which captured whatever shot the rocket way too clearly for comfort - they can't pawn it off on an accident or bug or bird, and I am certain the attackers moved whatever shot the rocket through the frame so fast they did not expect any camera to see anything at all. Five clear frames of video. 0.083 seconds of it total at 60 fps. I do not know the actual frames per second of the video, but all cameras of the caliber that took the video shoot at a baseline of 60 FPS, which means whatever the object was, it was going so fast that whoever was operating it did not expect it to be seen, and instead be blended into the background as a totally unidentifiable blur.
So now they are moaning about what this means for spaceX. Any topic but Hillary, who seems to be out of the news for the day.
For curiosity sake - some people might wonder why any video camera that shoots 60 FPS would ever need to expose each frame in 1/2000 of a second or less. The answer is that even though it obviously would not need to shoot that fast for most situations, if you want to film action it will make the video far more clear because things that are moving won't blur. And I am a little annoyed at the MSM outlets calling the video "blurry" when it is in fact crystal clear, so clear it showed whatever destroyed the rocket when there is not an Iphone or pocket cam on the planet that ever could have. Anyway, enough of that topic.
There is lots about Hillary on this page, and as far as I see it, saying the truth is not "tampering with an election process" unless criminals are out to rig it. If the truth hurts, those who are lying and covering up are rigging the election, and that means America's MSM, NOT RUSSIA. Thank you Russia, for helping America have more transparency! Yeah, when you go over the MSM today, all the cold hard proof in the world is being pawned off as "allegations" and conspiracy. Yep, that again.
--MEXICAN ANONYMOUS
SPACEX EXPLOSION & HILLARY'S EMAIL HACKS
Media quiet after FBI release
It seems like all they have to say is people are picking on Bill, and Russia is influencing America's elections. Most of it is also quiet about the obvious strike on a spaceX rocket. I guess those who did the attack on the rocket were not expecting a camera to be filming it that had a frame exposure speed of at least 2,000 - which captured whatever shot the rocket way too clearly for comfort - they can't pawn it off on an accident or bug or bird, and I am certain the attackers moved whatever shot the rocket through the frame so fast they did not expect any camera to see anything at all. Five clear frames of video. 0.083 seconds of it total at 60 fps. I do not know the actual frames per second of the video, but all cameras of the caliber that took the video shoot at a baseline of 60 FPS, which means whatever the object was, it was going so fast that whoever was operating it did not expect it to be seen, and instead be blended into the background as a totally unidentifiable blur.
So now they are moaning about what this means for spaceX. Any topic but Hillary, who seems to be out of the news for the day.
For curiosity sake - some people might wonder why any video camera that shoots 60 FPS would ever need to expose each frame in 1/2000 of a second or less. The answer is that even though it obviously would not need to shoot that fast for most situations, if you want to film action it will make the video far more clear because things that are moving won't blur. And I am a little annoyed at the MSM outlets calling the video "blurry" when it is in fact crystal clear, so clear it showed whatever destroyed the rocket when there is not an Iphone or pocket cam on the planet that ever could have. Anyway, enough of that topic.
There is lots about Hillary on this page, and as far as I see it, saying the truth is not "tampering with an election process" unless criminals are out to rig it. If the truth hurts, those who are lying and covering up are rigging the election, and that means America's MSM, NOT RUSSIA. Thank you Russia, for helping America have more transparency! Yeah, when you go over the MSM today, all the cold hard proof in the world is being pawned off as "allegations" and conspiracy. Yep, that again.
--MEXICAN ANONYMOUS