profile image
by TheaGood
on 19/5/16
The latest reports simply have the pilots going silent, no fire ball, no debris, just a sudden change of course and drop in altitude with de-activated transponder and silent pilots we saw with MH370. CONCLUSION: If this is true, the plane was diverted to an ISIS BASE. It had no fuel to go elsewhere, and no one else could have done this. After showing a sudden turn towards ISIS caliphate and sudden dive of the aircraft, the radar was blanked at around 20,000 feet, just like MH370. Unlike MH370, this plane was so close to the airport it would have been seen at less than 5,000 feet. If it disappeared from radar at 20,000 the way MH370 did . . . . . .JAMMER because that is not possible this time around, pieces or not. 66 people aboard. HMMMMMMMMM . . . 66 people aboard. Down from an originally reported 69. Yep. Time to find out if those 3 air marshals reported to be aboard were provided by MERCENARY security companies! THEY WOULD BE NEEDED TO THREATEN THE PASSENGERS AND CONFISCATE CELL PHONES AND MAKE THREATS TO PREVENT PASSENGERS FROM MAKING PHONE CALLS AFTER THE PLANE WAS FORCED DOWN IN SOME ISIS HELL BASE IN THE DESERT. BINGO, I THINK WE MIGHT HAVE IT, DEBRIS TRAIL OR THAT IS THE STORY. WHY THREE AIR MARSHALS FOR 56 PASSENGERS? BINGO!!!!

Now we really need the background of the passengers aboard. If there is no debris trail (I have confirmed all the reports on debris trails are a hoax so far) and if none actually show up, the plane was forced to land in ISIS Caliphate, there is no other possibility. DEBRIS TRAIL OR ISIS Caliphate, PERIOD, END OF DISCUSSION!

QUESTION: How do you revise the number of passengers and crew from 69 to 66 after the plane took off? Common core boarding log math tabulators???? How does that type of number, which is set in stone at the boarding booth get changed later? ISIS SHOOT DOWN, OR ISIS ELECTRONIC HIJACKING, that's how. The missing 3 people ARE WHO THEY WERE AFTER.
LET'S SEE THE CRYSTAL CLEAR DEBRIS TRAIL AND RECOVERED BODIES TO PROVE THE ABOVE IS NOT TRUE!
Original early report follows, for as long as no credible wreckage or bodies are found, the above is what I am going with, but here is the initial report, which was based on early reports which now appear to be inaccurate:

The lack of response from the pilots, and the flight pattern of the aircraft as it crashed strongly indicates a missile strike to the nose of the aircraft. If it was a bomb in the cargo hold or cabin, the pilots could have still talked as the plane broke up, and the breakup would have been faster. This breakup involved a 90 degree turn and a full 360 degree turn. This means the wings were still on the plane, and enough time passed for the pilots to radio a distress call. Lack of this proves a hit to the cockpit. Obviously "Islamic terrorists" are going to be blamed, (and already are) but this is most probably an Obama, Clinton and ISIS Nut production due to the altitude and location of the event, and the difficulty of getting a missile as high as the plane was flying. Only a missile could have done this. Easily accomplished from ISISi airspace.

And remember, it is still an "act of terror" if ISIS does it. Trump could be totally right about the "terror" angle, and totally wrong about who actually did it.

Hoax news sites are reporting ISIS responsibility and muddying the waters. Everything still points to missile strike by Israel. This is not a "bomb in the cabin" type incident, which would have given the pilots time to radio out. They were in contact with the ground when this happened, said nothing about anything, and vanished. That equals missile strike to the cockpit and in that area, only ISIS or the Egyptian government could have done it and I seriously doubt Egypt doing this. Who was aboard this aircraft? Same old important question . . . . .