Zika Virus- Part 2
From Mexican Anonymous
Here is a related piece of relevant info:
I have already consulted a very reputable doctor here in South America who I will not mention the name of to protect him, and he himself fingered the new vaccine as the probable culprit when I told him Brazil received a new Tdap shot that coincides with the timing of these new birth defects. He stated in no uncertain terms that there is no conceivable way the zika virus could have ever caused a birth defect and that something else that was not natural was at play, and he was suspicious that it was indeed caused by the intent of evil people.
He was well aware of the new secretive vaccine formulations being used to re-program the macrophages in the immune system to be aggressive against the body and do many types of damage, (especially brain damage) and that this was being done in a clandestine way. He then warned to never get a flu shot, the whole 9 yards, (I was actually surprised because he is very well papered) and that speaks volumes, because it indicates that even the well papered doctors are waking up.
Re the "zika virus outbreak"...how is it that so many individual doctors are allowing this shrunken brain epidemic to be laid on zika? Is there no attending physician ANYWHERE who has another insight into the sudden onset of this unfortunate malady? Are they being instructed at "gunpoint" to auto-report zika when they see the shrunken brain in a newborn, or are they individually scratching their heads, reporting an un-diagnosed malady, and allowing WHO or its local agents to do the diagnosing?
Obviously, my take on this is based on deductive logic which says 1. You can't have a mild virus that never caused a problem with newborns suddenly hit a knife edge, starting in November suddenly, like a lightning strike and destroy 2400 newborns in a single country between November 1 and December 30 with absolutely none happening before. Because this cannot happen, logical step 2: It has to be caused by something new, that was introduced while these women were pregnant. Because I happen to know a fair amount about random medical topics and am already up in arms over vaccines I knew variable 3: That in Latin America, all women are strongly encouraged to get various vaccines between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy.
If we have 2,400 freak occurences, which might happen to a country 10 times per year as a norm, suddenly strike like lightning and take out 2400 plus in only two months ( a 1,600 fold increase if you factor that into an entire upcoming year, and to make the numbers more obvious, that is a 160,000 percent increase,) there has to be a common binding factor causing it that is not any mosquito borne disease. It can't be a mosquito borne disease because ZERO in October to 1,200 in November and 1,200 in December cannot happen that way. If this was a mosquito borne zika virus problem, there would have been a trend - 5 in May, 30 in June, 100 in July, building up to what is happening now. The fact that did not build up to this final dreadful outcome proves there is something else causing this, and whoever spewed about Zika knows what it is, and that it is not Zika.
The only common binding women specific transmission vector that could make this possible is the Tdap vaccine. Shrunken baby brain occurences would suddenly show up like someone flipping a switch 18 - 20 weeks after such a batch of vaccines got introduced into Brazil. 20 weeks is five months. That leaves the end of May, June, July, August, September, October, Bam-0, in November it suddenly shows up in live births. They said Zika showed up in May. Math says something showed up in May but historical medical logic and precedent says it could not possibly be the zika virus.
As far as "allowing a shrunken brain epidemic", even if they figure out it is the Tdap vaccine (and I am sure many who can think are suspecting that, these people are not stupid) this scourge will continue for five and a half months after they shut it down. It is not a matter of allowing it, it is a matter of dealing with the consequences of an attack after being shot. The people pulling this scam may get away with it for a few more months, because people in the medical community tend to be overly trusting of those who call the shots, but beyond that they are going to have to start killing doctors until all that are smart enough to figure this out are eliminated. It is rational to think they know that and are ready to do exactly that.
Feb 1 2016
Zika a virtual proven psyop on Brazil
BACKGROUND: Brazil does not speak Spanish, Brazil speaks Portuguese. Keep that in mind, and read this from Edu in Brazil:
I called the virus zica on purpose, because it is slang for "bad luck" in Portuguese. I think "zika" was intended to be a pun also.
I think you nailed something with this, but do not think the original name had any specific purpose. I think that whoever is running this psy op took advantage of the name, and the name meaning "bad luck" in Brazil is probably the specific reason why Brazil was chosen. A coincidental name would have a huge psychological impact and perfect deniability. This coincidence needs to be shouted from the rooftops, it is just too perfect.
From Mexican Anonymous
Here is a related piece of relevant info:
I have already consulted a very reputable doctor here in South America who I will not mention the name of to protect him, and he himself fingered the new vaccine as the probable culprit when I told him Brazil received a new Tdap shot that coincides with the timing of these new birth defects. He stated in no uncertain terms that there is no conceivable way the zika virus could have ever caused a birth defect and that something else that was not natural was at play, and he was suspicious that it was indeed caused by the intent of evil people.
He was well aware of the new secretive vaccine formulations being used to re-program the macrophages in the immune system to be aggressive against the body and do many types of damage, (especially brain damage) and that this was being done in a clandestine way. He then warned to never get a flu shot, the whole 9 yards, (I was actually surprised because he is very well papered) and that speaks volumes, because it indicates that even the well papered doctors are waking up.
Re the "zika virus outbreak"...how is it that so many individual doctors are allowing this shrunken brain epidemic to be laid on zika? Is there no attending physician ANYWHERE who has another insight into the sudden onset of this unfortunate malady? Are they being instructed at "gunpoint" to auto-report zika when they see the shrunken brain in a newborn, or are they individually scratching their heads, reporting an un-diagnosed malady, and allowing WHO or its local agents to do the diagnosing?
Obviously, my take on this is based on deductive logic which says 1. You can't have a mild virus that never caused a problem with newborns suddenly hit a knife edge, starting in November suddenly, like a lightning strike and destroy 2400 newborns in a single country between November 1 and December 30 with absolutely none happening before. Because this cannot happen, logical step 2: It has to be caused by something new, that was introduced while these women were pregnant. Because I happen to know a fair amount about random medical topics and am already up in arms over vaccines I knew variable 3: That in Latin America, all women are strongly encouraged to get various vaccines between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy.
If we have 2,400 freak occurences, which might happen to a country 10 times per year as a norm, suddenly strike like lightning and take out 2400 plus in only two months ( a 1,600 fold increase if you factor that into an entire upcoming year, and to make the numbers more obvious, that is a 160,000 percent increase,) there has to be a common binding factor causing it that is not any mosquito borne disease. It can't be a mosquito borne disease because ZERO in October to 1,200 in November and 1,200 in December cannot happen that way. If this was a mosquito borne zika virus problem, there would have been a trend - 5 in May, 30 in June, 100 in July, building up to what is happening now. The fact that did not build up to this final dreadful outcome proves there is something else causing this, and whoever spewed about Zika knows what it is, and that it is not Zika.
The only common binding women specific transmission vector that could make this possible is the Tdap vaccine. Shrunken baby brain occurences would suddenly show up like someone flipping a switch 18 - 20 weeks after such a batch of vaccines got introduced into Brazil. 20 weeks is five months. That leaves the end of May, June, July, August, September, October, Bam-0, in November it suddenly shows up in live births. They said Zika showed up in May. Math says something showed up in May but historical medical logic and precedent says it could not possibly be the zika virus.
As far as "allowing a shrunken brain epidemic", even if they figure out it is the Tdap vaccine (and I am sure many who can think are suspecting that, these people are not stupid) this scourge will continue for five and a half months after they shut it down. It is not a matter of allowing it, it is a matter of dealing with the consequences of an attack after being shot. The people pulling this scam may get away with it for a few more months, because people in the medical community tend to be overly trusting of those who call the shots, but beyond that they are going to have to start killing doctors until all that are smart enough to figure this out are eliminated. It is rational to think they know that and are ready to do exactly that.
Feb 1 2016
Zika a virtual proven psyop on Brazil
BACKGROUND: Brazil does not speak Spanish, Brazil speaks Portuguese. Keep that in mind, and read this from Edu in Brazil:
I called the virus zica on purpose, because it is slang for "bad luck" in Portuguese. I think "zika" was intended to be a pun also.
I think you nailed something with this, but do not think the original name had any specific purpose. I think that whoever is running this psy op took advantage of the name, and the name meaning "bad luck" in Brazil is probably the specific reason why Brazil was chosen. A coincidental name would have a huge psychological impact and perfect deniability. This coincidence needs to be shouted from the rooftops, it is just too perfect.